Solana’s push toward $95 has more going on than a chart bounce. The network is sitting on a 26% rally, fresh governance votes, rising tokenized-asset activity, and a new SEC proposal that could reshape how some crypto fundraising works in the U.S. The catch: short-term momentum is already wobbling, and SOL still has to prove this move isn’t just another fast run that outruns itself.
- SOL traded near $95 after a roughly 26% rally
- Short-term momentum weakened as the 4-hour MACD turned bearish
- Governance votes and RWA growth are backing the longer-term bull case
- SEC’s Regulation Crypto Assets proposal is real, but still only a proposal
- $94.58 support and $97.68, $98.44 resistance are the near-term battleground
At press time on Aug. 24, SOL was trading at $94.71, after climbing from around $75 and then accelerating above $78 on Aug. 19. The move carried it roughly 26% higher, pushed it briefly above $100, and set an Aug. 22 wick at $102.88 before sellers forced a pullback toward the high $80s.
That is still a strong move. It is also exactly the sort of move that invites traders to start acting like the next leg is guaranteed. Markets rarely reward that kind of confidence. They usually punish it with a quick slap.
The setup matters because this isn’t just about price. Solana’s rally has arrived alongside a meaningful cluster of network developments: three formal governance proposals are being voted on, tokenized assets on the network crossed $4 billion, and the SEC proposed a new framework called Regulation Crypto Assets on Aug. 18. None of those things is a magic bullet. Together, though, they help explain why this move has more substance than a random speculative pop.
Momentum is still bullish, but the chart is flashing caution
On the daily chart, SOL remained above its 20-, 50-, 100-, and 200-day moving averages, which were sitting between $76.56 and $81.27. That keeps the broader trend constructive. In plain English: the longer-term direction still points up, even if the shorter-term candles have started to look tired.
The 4-hour chart tells a more fragile story. The MACD line slipped to 2.59, below its signal line at 3.09, and the histogram fell to minus 0.50. MACD, or Moving Average Convergence Divergence, is a momentum indicator. When the line drops below the signal line, it often means upward momentum is fading before price fully rolls over.
The Aroon indicator also gives a mixed read. Aroon Up was 85.71%, while Aroon Down was 42.86%. Aroon helps show how recently highs and lows have appeared, so a high Aroon Up suggests recent strength is still visible. The 4-hour ADX, which measures trend strength rather than direction, printed 71.50. That is a very strong trend reading, but strong trends can still break down if momentum dries up and the market runs into nearby supply.
For traders who prefer cleaner landmarks, the nearest resistance zone sits between $97.68 and $98.44. A breakout there would put $100 back in play, followed by the Aug. 22 high at $102.88. Crypto analyst Haris identified $98, $102 as the main resistance zone, which lines up with the structure on the chart.
Support is stacked below in a more orderly way than the usual crypto chaos suggests. First support sits near $94.58. Below that, traders are watching $92.50, $93.25, then $88.06, with deeper support at $83.49. A move below $78.91 would materially weaken the current structure and make the recent rally look a lot less convincing.
The Fibonacci retracement levels help explain those zones. Fibonacci retracements are technical levels traders use to mark possible pullback and rebound areas after a strong move. Here, the key levels were $83.49 and $88.06, representing the 50% and 61.8% retracement levels measured from $64.09 to $102.88. SOL tested those areas on the pullback, buyers defended them, and the price recovered to the $94.58 level.
That defense matters. A chart can stay healthy after a sharp pullback. It cannot stay healthy if buyers keep losing the same floor over and over.
Liquidation levels could amplify the next move
CoinGlass’ 24-hour liquidation heatmap shows the largest nearby concentration of leveraged positions around $96.20, $96.40, with more liquidity between roughly $97 and $99.50. Below the market, liquidation clusters sit around $93 and between $91.50 and $92.
Liquidation clusters are not the same thing as ordinary limit orders. They show where leveraged positions may be forced closed if price moves through them. That can turn into self-reinforcing volatility, but these pockets are dynamic. Traders reposition, leverage changes, and the map can shift fast. So yes, they matter. No, they are not a crystal ball.
The bullish case is bigger than a chart bounce
Solana’s network activity is giving the rally some actual fuel. RWA.xyz data showed tokenized assets on Solana crossing $4 billion for the first time, with roughly 348, 489 holders. In this context, RWA means tokenized real-world assets, things like Treasuries, funds, or other financial instruments represented on-chain.
That milestone is worth paying attention to because it suggests real usage, not just speculative token trading and whatever flavor of degenerate memecoin roulette happens to be popular this week. Still, a bigger headline number does not erase the usual risks. Custody, legal uncertainty, and counterparty exposure do not magically disappear because something lives on a blockchain.
Solana also has governance activity that actually matters. Voting is open on the network’s first three formal governance proposals through epoch 1023, expected to end on Aug. 27 at approximately 15:30 UTC.
SGP-0001 would introduce the Solana Constitution as a common governance framework. In practical terms, that is about how the network formalizes decision-making and shared rules around upgrades and governance norms.
SGP-0002 would double the network’s annual disinflation rate from 15% to 30%. Put simply, it would slow new SOL issuance growth faster over time. The source says that could remove about 18.9 million SOL from scheduled emissions over six years. That is not trivial, and it directly affects token economics.
SGP-0003 proposes a new resource and inclusion fee structure. That sounds dry, but fee design is one of the things that actually determines whether a network feels efficient or annoying. SolanaFloor estimated the proposal could lift daily SOL burning from about 648 tokens to roughly 9, 000. That is an estimate, not a guaranteed outcome, but it shows why this vote is more than governance theater.
Governance changes like these can influence issuance, fee pressure, and how the chain coordinates future upgrades. They also carry real tradeoffs. Lower issuance growth can support long-term supply discipline, but fee changes can affect user experience and validator economics. This is the part of crypto that is less sexy than price charts and more important than price charts.
Regulation is helping the mood, but don’t confuse a proposal with law
The broader market backdrop has also helped risk assets, but it would be sloppy to pretend every macro headline directly explains Solana’s move. More useful here is the regulatory shift itself: on Aug. 18, the SEC proposed Regulation Crypto Assets.
That proposal is important because it aims to create a tailored securities offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. According to the SEC, it includes two exemptions from Securities Act registration, plus a conditional safe harbor if specific conditions are met. In plain English, the agency is trying to create a more explicit route for some crypto projects to raise capital without operating in pure legal fog.
It is also still just a proposal. Public comments remain open for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register, so this is the start of the policy fight, not the finish line.
The SEC’s move matters because it could reduce some of the “regulate by surprise” nonsense that has long haunted U.S. crypto markets. But let’s not overhype it: a proposal is not a rule, and crypto has been burned enough times by pretending political momentum equals actual legal certainty.
The important distinction is that this framework is not the SEC suddenly waving a neon “all clear” sign at crypto. It is the agency acknowledging that the market exists and that a more specific framework may be better than endless ambiguity. That is progress. It is also bureaucracy doing what bureaucracy does: taking its sweet time and wrapping everything in dense language.
What the levels mean now
The short-term picture is pretty straightforward. If SOL holds above $94.58 and pushes through $97.68, $98.44, the next test is $100, then $102.88. If it loses $94.58, the market likely revisits $92.50, $93.25 first, with $88.06 and $83.49 as the next major supports.
The larger picture still leans bullish because SOL is trading above major daily moving averages and the network is showing real activity in tokenized assets and governance. But the 4-hour MACD crossover is a clear warning that the rally has cooled. That can lead to a healthy reset. It can also lead to a deeper pullback if support starts slipping and liquidity pockets get hit.
For now, Solana’s story has both sides of the usual crypto coin: genuine on-chain adoption and governance progress on one side, and a market that can still turn twitchy the moment momentum fades on the other. The fundamentals are improving. The chart still needs to prove it can keep up.
Key questions and takeaways
-
Is Solana still in an uptrend?
Yes. SOL is still above its major daily moving averages, so the broader trend remains intact even though short-term momentum has weakened. -
Why does the bearish MACD crossover matter?
MACD turning bearish suggests the rally is losing momentum. That does not guarantee a dump, but it does raise the odds of consolidation or a pullback. -
What is the most important support level right now?
$94.58 is the first key support. If that gives way, the next levels to watch are $92.50, $93.25 and then $88.06. -
Where is resistance?
The nearest resistance zone is $97.68, $98.44. A clean break there would bring $100 back into view, followed by $102.88. -
Why are Solana’s governance votes important?
SGP-0001, SGP-0002, and SGP-0003 could affect governance structure, issuance growth, and fee mechanics. Those are core network economics, not cosmetic upgrades. -
Does the SEC’s Regulation Crypto Assets proposal settle U.S. crypto policy?
No. It is still only a proposal, with public comments open and details that can change before anything becomes final. -
Is the $4 billion tokenized-asset milestone meaningful?
Yes. It shows real activity on Solana beyond pure speculation, but it does not prove permanent adoption or guarantee continued growth. -
What could make SOL move sharply next?
The most obvious catalysts are a break above $98, $100 or a failure of $94.58 support. Nearby liquidation clusters could also amplify volatility if price moves through them.
Further reading
A few useful references on Solana, market structure, and the latest network developments:
