Luno Cuts 20% of Staff as Crypto Firms Pivot to Institutional Revenue

Daily Feed
Luno Cuts 20% of Staff as Crypto Firms Pivot to Institutional Revenue

Luno is cutting about 20% of its global workforce as it pushes harder into institutional and business-to-business revenue, a reminder that crypto companies still live and die by where the real money is, not where the hype is.

  • About 20% of staff are being cut globally
  • B2B and institutional services are becoming a bigger focus
  • Automation and operational changes are part of the rationale
  • July crypto layoffs keep piling up
  • The exact headcount impact at Luno remains undisclosed

Luno chief executive James Lanigan said on July 28 that the company is building a “leaner and adapted structure” that is “both necessary and appropriate.” Bloomberg Tax reported that Luno is cutting about 20% of staff globally, but the exchange did not say how many people are affected, which regions are included, or which teams are being cut.

That missing detail matters. A 20% cut looks neat on paper. In real life, it can mean a lot of people, a lot of disruption, and a lot of carefully worded corporate messaging designed to make a painful move sound like strategic zen.

Luno, which is owned by Digital Currency Group, said it will keep investing in compliance, core infrastructure, and selected retail products. At the same time, it is scaling its business-to-business unit and expanding services for institutional customers, the professional end of the market, meaning funds, trading firms, and businesses that want execution tools, liquidity, and infrastructure rather than the usual retail circus.

In plain English, liquidity and trading infrastructure are the plumbing that lets larger clients buy and sell without turning every order into a price-swinging mess. That is a steadier business than chasing meme traders, though it comes with its own baggage: fierce competition, heavier compliance demands, and margins that can get squeezed if a firm overpromises and underdelivers.

Luno also pointed to automation and broader operational changes as reasons the current staffing level is no longer needed. That could mean real efficiency gains, or it could mean management found ways to do more work with fewer people. In crypto, those two explanations often wear the same hoodie.

This is not Luno’s first belt-tightening move. In January 2023, the company announced a 35% reduction during the crypto winter. Contemporary reporting at the time estimated that more than 330 roles were affected from a workforce of roughly 960. That earlier cut suggests this latest move is not some panic-fueled one-off. It looks more like a company that keeps deciding its old shape no longer fits the market.

The shift toward institutional and B2B services makes sense on paper. Retail activity is volatile, sentiment flips fast, and speculative volume can vanish the second the market gets dull or ugly. Institutional business tends to be less flashy, but it can be more durable if the company can actually build the right rails and keep them running. The catch is that “more durable” does not mean easy. Institutional sales cycles are slower, the technical expectations are higher, and compliance can become a never-ending tax on time and money.

That broader pressure is showing up across crypto in July. CryptoJobsList has tracked a wave of disclosed restructurings across the sector, including Luno, Gnosis, Uphold, BitMart, Dango, Odos, BitMEX, Exodus, Polygon Labs, AscendEX, Zapper, and Yield Guild Games.

Those figures should be treated as disclosed minimums, not an audited industry headcount of doom. CryptoJobsList relies on public announcements and media reports, and it also includes fintech and crypto-adjacent firms, so the real number is almost certainly messier than any neat tracker can capture.

Still, the published numbers for six of those companies add up to 894 affected jobs: 550 at BitMart, 160 at BitMEX, 85 at Uphold, 54 at Exodus, 35 at Yield Guild Games, and 10 at Odos. That is not pocket change. It is a pretty loud signal that crypto firms are still trimming fat, reworking priorities, and trying to find business lines that behave like businesses instead of mood swings.

Gnosis offers a useful counterpoint. In its second-quarter report published on July 17, the company said it reduced the team behind the Gnosis App and planned to remove the app from Gnosis Ltd in the third quarter. A smaller team is expected to seek DAO funding for an independent company.

A DAO, or decentralized autonomous organization, is a blockchain-based governance structure where funding and decisions can be directed by token holders or a community process rather than a classic corporate hierarchy. In theory, that can give a product more independence. In practice, it can also mean a slower, stranger version of corporate politics, just with more multisig wallets.

Gnosis co-founder Friederike Ernst was blunt about why the change was happening:

“growth has been linear, and linear is not good enough”

That line lands because it cuts through the usual startup fluff. She was not saying the product was dead. She was saying the current structure was too slow for what the product needed.

And the numbers back that up. Gnosis said the app had about 800 active card users in the second quarter, up from roughly 500 in the first quarter. Daily and weekly active users also increased. So this was not a simple case of “product bad, fire people.” It was more of a structural reset. The app had momentum, but management decided it needed a smaller team and faster decision-making outside the larger organization.

That distinction matters. In crypto, layoffs are often read as proof that a company is failing. Sometimes that is true. Sometimes it is a sign that management built too much overhead, then finally remembered the bills. Gnosis is a decent example of the second case: the product can be growing and the org chart can still be wrong.

Other firms have been more explicit about the financial logic. Exodus cut 25% of its workforce and said about 77 employees and individual service providers would be affected, while projecting annual cash savings of $10 million to $13 million. BitGo cut nearly 15% of its workforce in June. Luno, by contrast, has not announced comparable savings targets, which leaves outsiders with a broad strategic explanation rather than a crisp financial one.

That gap is worth noting. When one company gives a savings target and another just says the structure is leaner now, the second company may still be making a perfectly rational move, but it is asking the market to trust the vibe more than the math. That is not always reassuring.

The wider takeaway is not that crypto is collapsing again. It is that the industry is still sorting out what deserves to survive. Retail speculation grabs headlines, but compliance, infrastructure, payments, custody-adjacent tools, and institutional trading rails are where many firms now see more durable revenue. That is less sexy than moonshot marketing, but it is also a lot closer to how real businesses work.

There is a less flattering side to this too. “Market conditions” can be a real reason for cuts, but it can also be a convenient umbrella for sloppy hiring, bloated headcount, and strategic drift. Crypto has seen plenty of all three. The sector has no shortage of people who can explain why they hired too fast. Fewer of them can explain why the payroll bill should be treated like a startup virtue.

Luno’s cut looks like a mix of cost control, strategic refocus, and plain old sector pressure. The message across crypto is getting hard to ignore: the companies that survive are the ones that can turn traffic, compliance, and infrastructure into recurring revenue. The rest are learning, painfully, that headcount is not a business model.

Key questions and takeaways

  • Why is Luno cutting staff?
    Luno says automation and broader operational changes have changed what it needs from its workforce, while it shifts more attention toward institutional and B2B services.
  • How many people are being laid off?
    About 20% of Luno’s global workforce is affected, but the company has not disclosed the exact number.
  • Is Luno abandoning retail users?
    No. Luno says it will keep investing in selected retail products, even as it focuses more heavily on compliance, infrastructure, and business-facing services.
  • Are layoffs happening across crypto right now?
    Yes. CryptoJobsList has tracked a July wave of disclosed restructurings, though its figures are minimums based on public reporting rather than an audited total.
  • Does a layoff always mean a crypto company is failing?
    No. Gnosis shows that a product can still have user growth and still need a different structure to move faster and operate better.
  • What’s the bigger trend here?
    Crypto firms are shrinking, automating, and chasing steadier revenue from compliance, infrastructure, and institutional clients instead of relying on retail hype.

Further reading

A few extra sources for readers who want the broader backdrop on Luno, exchange competition, and the structural shakeout across crypto.

Share this article

Powered by ADBYTES

Advertise smarter.

Adbytes.Media is a transparent advertising network where advertisers reach real audiences and publishers, affiliates & everyday members earn ADBYTES tokens. Join the community and start earning today.

Back to Blog